Bandwidth Saver

Something on your mind? Want to give us feedback on something in particular or everything in general? Tell us how we are doing!
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:41 pm
Location: Mid-West

Bandwidth Saver

Post by gathered_stones » Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:05 pm

Currently, I am of the assumption that I am receiving a g.711 codec with a higher bandwidth usage (with header overhead about 92Kbps persecon in each direction). Comcast is flaky! Can you change my service to g.729, g.723 or g.726 as a bandwidth saving option?

Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:12 am

Re: Bandwidth Saver

Post by VagyokC4 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:42 am

Yes! Vonage offers a bandwidth saving option as well...

Posts: 885
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:53 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY

Re: Bandwidth Saver

Post by niknak » Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:18 pm

QOS settings to control bandwidth ( as available on ooma) make calls sound better as opposed to compression algorithms

User avatar
Posts: 1003
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:47 am
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: Bandwidth Saver

Post by scottlindner » Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:07 am

Isn't this similar to the voice quality slider suggestion from a while ago? ... &sk=t&sd=a

User avatar
Dennis P
Ooma Moderator
Posts: 1858
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:09 am
Location: Palo Alto, CA

Re: Bandwidth Saver

Post by Dennis P » Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:43 pm

ooma uses the iLBC codec by default (not G.711) which consumes <30kbps during an active call. When you dial *99, we shift to G.711 instead to support FAX/modems, and you might hear a slight increase in call quality. For most users, however, the lower bandwidth requirements and error correction/redundancy built into iLBC will produce more consistent results.

Post Reply