New record for # port

Need extra help installing your Ooma Hub or Telo system? Let us know.
Post Reply
oomadan
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:06 pm

New record for # port

Post by oomadan » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:12 pm

This may be a new record for porting a number to Ooma,4 days!! Started port from Vonage 4/4, completed 4/8 at noon. Very happy so far :D

User avatar
lbmofo
Posts: 9337
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:37 pm
Location: Greater Seattle
Contact:

Re: New record for # port

Post by lbmofo » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:43 pm

Congrats!
Customer Since: 3/13/10
Hardware: Telo & Hub
Service: Premier 12/06/10
Verizon Port: 3/15/10 - 4/02/10
Internet: 100 Mbps/10 Mbps
Setup: SB6141/R6700/Ooma
MainStreetSHARES Ebates: get Ca$h Back when you shop online!!

Image

User avatar
Davesworld
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:06 pm
Location: Everett, Wa
Contact:

Re: New record for # port

Post by Davesworld » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:19 pm

Still three days longer than what is legal and as I said in another thread, it is the losing carrier that determines how quickly the port takes place and also as I said in another thread, you are bragging about the losing carrier's handling of this, not Ooma's. We're not out of the woods yet by a long shot. Not sure how well the FCC is going to be able to enforce the new mandate of which small carriers had until Feb 2011 to comply, larger carriers were supposed to last August.

http://www.commlawblog.com/2010/05/arti ... e-numbers/

User avatar
EA PA
Posts: 576
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:19 am

Re: New record for # port

Post by EA PA » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:53 pm

Davesworld wrote:Still three days longer than what is legal and as I said in another thread, it is the losing carrier that determines how quickly the port takes place and also as I said in another thread, you are bragging about the losing carrier's handling of this, not Ooma's. We're not out of the woods yet by a long shot. Not sure how well the FCC is going to be able to enforce the new mandate of which small carriers had until Feb 2011 to comply, larger carriers were supposed to last August.

http://www.commlawblog.com/2010/05/arti ... e-numbers/
It seems to me that there are actually 2 parties that control the fate of porting duration. The requesting party needs to respond quickly to request and if not, will decide the efficiency of the first half. Of course there is the second party as well. So if it takes 4 days, it could be either the requestor or the loser that are using any combination of the 4 days, or 1 day if fully compliant with regulation. No?
Customer Since: 12/2010
Telecom Equipment: 1 Telo, 1 Handset, (4) Dect 6 Uniden DECT1580-4WXTPT
IN THE MONEY: 09/2011
Poor Legacy Carrier: Frontier

User avatar
lbmofo
Posts: 9337
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:37 pm
Location: Greater Seattle
Contact:

Re: New record for # port

Post by lbmofo » Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:08 am

Davesworld wrote:Still three days longer than what is legal
FCC mandated 1 day porting only applies to simple ports. Ports involving reseller (Ooma) are excluded. Hence, in the case of port out from Ooma, Ooma's carrier doesn't have to comply with the 1 day porting ruling (other than the 4 hour response to reject requested porting timeline within the 1 day porting parameters).

http://comptel.org//Files/Webinar/02-24 ... orting.pdf
Page 7: simple ports

http://www.kelleydrye.com/publications/ ... ories/0463
Non simple ports: (1) unbundled network elements; (2) multiple lines; (3) complex switch translations (e.g., Centrex, ISDN, AIN services, remote call forwarding, or multiple services on the loop); and (4) resellers.
Davesworld wrote:as I said in another thread, it is the losing carrier that determines how quickly the port takes place and also as I said in another thread, you are bragging about the losing carrier's handling of this, not Ooma's. We're not out of the woods yet by a long shot. Not sure how well the FCC is going to be able to enforce the new mandate of which small carriers had until Feb 2011 to comply, larger carriers were supposed to last August.
In the case of port-in to Ooma, it all depends on where the number is coming from. If number is coming from one of the big boys (and does not involve a reseller), then Ooma's carrier can request port in timeline inline with 1 day porting (we want it by next business day! Given port request submitted by 1pm local NPAC region time). I am thinking due to reasons internal to Ooma and Ooma's carriers, Ooma & carriers are asking for variable turnaround times but not 1 business day.

In this "4 day port" record, Ooma/carrier probably requested 4 days turnaround and Vonage agreed; hence, the record setting 4 day turnaround. So if a port goes through relatively fast like this one, all parties involved deserve a compliment (winning reseller ooma, winning carrier, losing carrier, possible losing reseller). We may yet see 1 day porting for numbers coming into Ooma but that will only happen with Ooma/carrier requesting 1 business day turnaround.

http://www.kelleydrye.com/publications/ ... ories/0463
"providers to complete simple ports within one business day unless the requesting provider or customer asks for more time."
Customer Since: 3/13/10
Hardware: Telo & Hub
Service: Premier 12/06/10
Verizon Port: 3/15/10 - 4/02/10
Internet: 100 Mbps/10 Mbps
Setup: SB6141/R6700/Ooma
MainStreetSHARES Ebates: get Ca$h Back when you shop online!!

Image

User avatar
Davesworld
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:06 pm
Location: Everett, Wa
Contact:

Re: New record for # port

Post by Davesworld » Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:22 pm

I was afraid there would be a loophole that I missed but it's still better than what we had. Thanks for pointing that out lbmofo. I remember when it took a month and for some it was much longer. I now understand the enthusiasm posted here for times less than a week.

geobernd
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:53 pm

Re: New record for # port

Post by geobernd » Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:16 pm

While 4 days is not bad I agree with previous posts. Additionally - looking at the specific 'from' side (Vonage) here: I have ported from Vonage to another Provider in under 24 hours - so it looks like Vonage is actually quite capable of meeting the <1 day requirement if the winning carrier supports it...

Post Reply