<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ooma Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ooma.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog</link>
	<description>Get behind the scenes with Ooma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:23:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Voice Mail for All Ooma Users by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/10/21/free-voice-mail-for-all-ooma-users/comment-page-1/#comment-7748</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/?p=329#comment-7748</guid>
		<description>As a Premier user for about 6 months now I couldn&#039;t be more satisfied with the service.  While I have no intention of switching it still impresses me to see a company listen to it&#039;s customers (all the more reason to support OOMA).

To all the users on the basic plan, if you want more features (i.e. Caller Name), give some serious thought to upgrading to the Premeir plan instead of asking for it for &#039;free&#039; (yes I know you purchased the hardware).  OOMA&#039;s Premier plan is still one of the least expensive VOIP options available (certainly if call quality is considered).  Upgrading to Premier is a great way to get the features you want (and then some), and will maintain the viability of the OOMA business model.  It will also promote more advanced features as the number of Premier subsribers grow and warrant the effort/money spent on new features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Premier user for about 6 months now I couldn&#8217;t be more satisfied with the service.  While I have no intention of switching it still impresses me to see a company listen to it&#8217;s customers (all the more reason to support OOMA).</p>
<p>To all the users on the basic plan, if you want more features (i.e. Caller Name), give some serious thought to upgrading to the Premeir plan instead of asking for it for &#8216;free&#8217; (yes I know you purchased the hardware).  OOMA&#8217;s Premier plan is still one of the least expensive VOIP options available (certainly if call quality is considered).  Upgrading to Premier is a great way to get the features you want (and then some), and will maintain the viability of the OOMA business model.  It will also promote more advanced features as the number of Premier subsribers grow and warrant the effort/money spent on new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customer Support is a Major Focus for Ooma by Jason Bunting</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/10/26/customer-support-is-a-major-focus-for-ooma/comment-page-1/#comment-7747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/?p=337#comment-7747</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I am strongly considering purchasing an Ooma system, but after spending the last 45 minutes reading the most recent 4 blog posts and the associated comments, I may end up purchasing it without the full level of satisfaction I had originally hoped for.

Some of the issues are, for me, hard to accept. Namely, the overseas support, the new fees on what was supposed to be &quot;free&quot; service, and the caller ID function.

Other issues, such as the not-so-strange 5000 minute &quot;limit&quot;, and the free, then not free, then free again voice mail (I have a phone with voice mail, I don&#039;t think it is that strange that this feature is not free) are not as big a deal.

One other issue that bothers me is the lack of response from the company here in the blog comments. If you are going to have a blog and allow comments, at least plan on responding to posted comments within a reasonable amount of time, such as 24 hours. Even if your response amounts to &quot;we are looking into this&quot; or &quot;we are considering this option,&quot; it is better than no response at all. People like me come here and are left to think &quot;Hmm, they don&#039;t seem to care too much about what people are saying.&quot; 

If you are responding to posts by sending the poster an email, that&#039;s fine if the information is private, but at least post a message here that says something to the effect of &quot;John Doe, I just sent you an email detailing our response to your issue&quot; so that other people know you are responsive.

Just my 2 cents, I hope I get the good feeling back about Ooma soon, I really want to get Qwest out of my life as much as possible (a 2 year DSL contract will prevent me from fully eliminating them at this time) but I do not want to leave one bad company for another. Obviously you cannot please everyone, but there are some basics here that I think are obvious. 

Maybe you should offer the &quot;free&quot; service but have, as optional, a la carte features, those items that people seem to be requesting most - voice mail, caller id, call waiting - for a reasonable additional cost.

Thanks,
Jason Bunting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I am strongly considering purchasing an Ooma system, but after spending the last 45 minutes reading the most recent 4 blog posts and the associated comments, I may end up purchasing it without the full level of satisfaction I had originally hoped for.</p>
<p>Some of the issues are, for me, hard to accept. Namely, the overseas support, the new fees on what was supposed to be &#8220;free&#8221; service, and the caller ID function.</p>
<p>Other issues, such as the not-so-strange 5000 minute &#8220;limit&#8221;, and the free, then not free, then free again voice mail (I have a phone with voice mail, I don&#8217;t think it is that strange that this feature is not free) are not as big a deal.</p>
<p>One other issue that bothers me is the lack of response from the company here in the blog comments. If you are going to have a blog and allow comments, at least plan on responding to posted comments within a reasonable amount of time, such as 24 hours. Even if your response amounts to &#8220;we are looking into this&#8221; or &#8220;we are considering this option,&#8221; it is better than no response at all. People like me come here and are left to think &#8220;Hmm, they don&#8217;t seem to care too much about what people are saying.&#8221; </p>
<p>If you are responding to posts by sending the poster an email, that&#8217;s fine if the information is private, but at least post a message here that says something to the effect of &#8220;John Doe, I just sent you an email detailing our response to your issue&#8221; so that other people know you are responsive.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents, I hope I get the good feeling back about Ooma soon, I really want to get Qwest out of my life as much as possible (a 2 year DSL contract will prevent me from fully eliminating them at this time) but I do not want to leave one bad company for another. Obviously you cannot please everyone, but there are some basics here that I think are obvious. </p>
<p>Maybe you should offer the &#8220;free&#8221; service but have, as optional, a la carte features, those items that people seem to be requesting most &#8211; voice mail, caller id, call waiting &#8211; for a reasonable additional cost.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jason Bunting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customer Support is a Major Focus for Ooma by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/10/26/customer-support-is-a-major-focus-for-ooma/comment-page-1/#comment-7746</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/?p=337#comment-7746</guid>
		<description>Matthew, you must wait until the recorded message is finished before pressing 1 for tech support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew, you must wait until the recorded message is finished before pressing 1 for tech support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customer Support is a Major Focus for Ooma by Jann Gobble</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/10/26/customer-support-is-a-major-focus-for-ooma/comment-page-1/#comment-7745</link>
		<dc:creator>Jann Gobble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/?p=337#comment-7745</guid>
		<description>I have a similar issue with call centers based in places where english is not their first language.  I have hung up before and ceased doing business with credit card companies that push support overseas -- as I cannot understand them most of the time.  I have done the same with computer, software and/or technology companies.  I would NOT have a problem doing so with a telephone company.  Think about it.  When you are in trouble (tech-wise *or* having a problem with your home loan or credit card) the last thing you want to worry about is whether or not the support agent can actually understand what you are saying and/or whether you have to dumb-down your normal speech to get your point across.

Be careful saving money by outsourcing customer support/service.  You can lose far more customers than the money you gain with the lower cost.  Your image can also be forever tarnished.  I, for one, also think tech support (for premiere) should be 24 hour/7 day a week service.  Since when did PacBell/AT&amp;T decided that they did not have to be open after 5 or 6pm (when people actually get home from work and can conduct personal business).  

In this economy many Americans have rebelled when American companies have been found to have moved customer support/service overseas -- or opened support offices overseas instead of in the US.  Consumers can easily take it as a slight.  Personally I think it is a stupid move to have Support/Customer Services anywhere but in the US.  It is much easier to pay for a call center in, say, Alabama -- if as is usually the case the labor laws or the hourly rate is too expensive where the corporate headquarters is located -- than to deal with the backlash from the idea that Ooma has decided to take money we pay them and move that money overseas to employ people in other countries.

Just my $.02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a similar issue with call centers based in places where english is not their first language.  I have hung up before and ceased doing business with credit card companies that push support overseas &#8212; as I cannot understand them most of the time.  I have done the same with computer, software and/or technology companies.  I would NOT have a problem doing so with a telephone company.  Think about it.  When you are in trouble (tech-wise *or* having a problem with your home loan or credit card) the last thing you want to worry about is whether or not the support agent can actually understand what you are saying and/or whether you have to dumb-down your normal speech to get your point across.</p>
<p>Be careful saving money by outsourcing customer support/service.  You can lose far more customers than the money you gain with the lower cost.  Your image can also be forever tarnished.  I, for one, also think tech support (for premiere) should be 24 hour/7 day a week service.  Since when did PacBell/AT&amp;T decided that they did not have to be open after 5 or 6pm (when people actually get home from work and can conduct personal business).  </p>
<p>In this economy many Americans have rebelled when American companies have been found to have moved customer support/service overseas &#8212; or opened support offices overseas instead of in the US.  Consumers can easily take it as a slight.  Personally I think it is a stupid move to have Support/Customer Services anywhere but in the US.  It is much easier to pay for a call center in, say, Alabama &#8212; if as is usually the case the labor laws or the hourly rate is too expensive where the corporate headquarters is located &#8212; than to deal with the backlash from the idea that Ooma has decided to take money we pay them and move that money overseas to employ people in other countries.</p>
<p>Just my $.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ooma and Google Voice by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/03/18/ooma-and-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-7743</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/03/18/ooma-and-google-voice/#comment-7743</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think GV and Ooma will ever work together.  Seems like GV would hurt rev for ooma.  I am not happy that you need a premier acct to get you VM messages fw to email.  This is crazy. I got my Ooma a year ago and now everything is changing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think GV and Ooma will ever work together.  Seems like GV would hurt rev for ooma.  I am not happy that you need a premier acct to get you VM messages fw to email.  This is crazy. I got my Ooma a year ago and now everything is changing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ooma and Google Voice by nate</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/03/18/ooma-and-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-7742</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/03/18/ooma-and-google-voice/#comment-7742</guid>
		<description>GV  + Ooma was supposed to be live last summer..? so what happend. wish we could get honest date range on when it will be out. they need to keep packing the features, and GV, if they want to keep premier subscribers like me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GV  + Ooma was supposed to be live last summer..? so what happend. wish we could get honest date range on when it will be out. they need to keep packing the features, and GV, if they want to keep premier subscribers like me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Voice Mail for All Ooma Users by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/10/21/free-voice-mail-for-all-ooma-users/comment-page-1/#comment-7741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/?p=329#comment-7741</guid>
		<description>I kind of agree with Anthony Williams. With Hubs selling at almost the same price as Telco&#039;s ... it was the free voicemail that prompted me to elect the older technology. I suspect you might see quite a few returned Hubs now. Ironically, I didn&#039;t realize caller ID Name was no longer a Basic feature. Maybe you could offer that to Hub owners instead. Candidly, these features are included in most VOIP services and while I feel &quot;late to the dance&quot; with Ooma ... the removal of these most basic of services is a little concerning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of agree with Anthony Williams. With Hubs selling at almost the same price as Telco&#8217;s &#8230; it was the free voicemail that prompted me to elect the older technology. I suspect you might see quite a few returned Hubs now. Ironically, I didn&#8217;t realize caller ID Name was no longer a Basic feature. Maybe you could offer that to Hub owners instead. Candidly, these features are included in most VOIP services and while I feel &#8220;late to the dance&#8221; with Ooma &#8230; the removal of these most basic of services is a little concerning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customer Support is a Major Focus for Ooma by Matthew Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/10/26/customer-support-is-a-major-focus-for-ooma/comment-page-1/#comment-7740</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/?p=337#comment-7740</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking about buying; i called your support line from 3 different phones to validate that you have live support.  Pressing 2 gave me a recorded message repeating a URL.  That&#039;s pointless and offensive.  Pressing 1 apparently doesn&#039;t work - no tech support, just the same &#039;press 1 for tech support&#039; message over &amp; over.  DTMF was invented in the 60&#039;s, guys.  It doesn&#039;t say much for credibility that your phone tree doesn&#039;t even recognize a 1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about buying; i called your support line from 3 different phones to validate that you have live support.  Pressing 2 gave me a recorded message repeating a URL.  That&#8217;s pointless and offensive.  Pressing 1 apparently doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; no tech support, just the same &#8216;press 1 for tech support&#8217; message over &amp; over.  DTMF was invented in the 60&#8217;s, guys.  It doesn&#8217;t say much for credibility that your phone tree doesn&#8217;t even recognize a 1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Customer Support is a Major Focus for Ooma by southsound</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/10/26/customer-support-is-a-major-focus-for-ooma/comment-page-1/#comment-7739</link>
		<dc:creator>southsound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/?p=337#comment-7739</guid>
		<description>To answer Lucy&#039;s question - yes. You don&#039;t really need a landline at all. The caveat is that if you have DSL you will have to have your telco do a &quot;dry loop&quot; or when your landline is gone, your DSL will be as well. Dending on your contract with your telco, it may be financially advantageous to keep your landline. I chose to do so and also chose to NOT integrate that landline with my ooma systems. Why? Because there are few if any advantages to having  the landline integrated. I keep a separate DECT 6.0 cordless base on my landline and use a similar  base on my hub. 

If you are using cable as your Internet source, you have no need for your old telco at all. In both cases you are able to port your existing number to your ooma ($39.95 or free if you subscribe to Premier for a year) - but if you have DSL you will want the telco to &quot;dry loop&quot; your line before starting the port. After the &quot;dry loop&quot; your DSL will have its own number and you will not loose it when the port is complete. Visit the ooma forums for a lot of great information from others who have had great success with ooma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer Lucy&#8217;s question &#8211; yes. You don&#8217;t really need a landline at all. The caveat is that if you have DSL you will have to have your telco do a &#8220;dry loop&#8221; or when your landline is gone, your DSL will be as well. Dending on your contract with your telco, it may be financially advantageous to keep your landline. I chose to do so and also chose to NOT integrate that landline with my ooma systems. Why? Because there are few if any advantages to having  the landline integrated. I keep a separate DECT 6.0 cordless base on my landline and use a similar  base on my hub. </p>
<p>If you are using cable as your Internet source, you have no need for your old telco at all. In both cases you are able to port your existing number to your ooma ($39.95 or free if you subscribe to Premier for a year) &#8211; but if you have DSL you will want the telco to &#8220;dry loop&#8221; your line before starting the port. After the &#8220;dry loop&#8221; your DSL will have its own number and you will not loose it when the port is complete. Visit the ooma forums for a lot of great information from others who have had great success with ooma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ooma and Google Voice by Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/03/18/ooma-and-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-7738</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ooma.com/blog/2009/03/18/ooma-and-google-voice/#comment-7738</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for this feature before I buy a Telo. Any updates? It has been 8 months since this was announced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for this feature before I buy a Telo. Any updates? It has been 8 months since this was announced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
